Skin
Market
Women’s perceptions of aging are changing. Today, they
want to feel as good as they look.
That’s the conclusion of “Age redefined: a frank
perspective on marketing to women as they age,” a new
study from Winston-Salem, MA based Frank About Women.
“The results of this study defy conventional wisdom
about older women,” said Siobhan Olson, a director with
Frank About Women. “While looking young and healthy
is still important, (women) also care more about how they
feel as they age.”
 |
Featured
Age Defining Product |
A majority of women in the study—55%— said “aging
well” means looking great, but not necessarily younger:
only 12% of respondents defined “aging well” as
looking younger, Frank About Women executives said. And 25%
of women in the survey said “old age” never begins.
In addition, WSL Strategic Retail’s The Pulse survey
reported that people are spending less all-over time on frills.
For example, 34% of female respondents said they spend less
time on their makeup now than they did five years ago due
to a much more hectic lifestyle, WSL executives reported.
Does all this spell disaster for the skin care industry?
Certainly not. While the concept of “vanity” is
taking a backseat, “health” has taken its place,
and though a healthy glow really does begin on the inside,
it never hurts to have a little outside help. Marketers are
ready with the latest products that enhance rather than overwhelm,
and fit the lifestyle of today’s busy woman.
The Skinny on Skin Care
According to industry experts, now is a good time for skin
care to get a face lift. Sales of facial moisturizers were
flat at $256 million in supermarkets, drug stores and mass
merchandisers (excluding Wal-Mart) for the 52 weeks ending
Jan. 25, according to Information Resources Inc. (IRI), Chicago.
And the hand and body lotion category declined 2.57% to $779
million for the period, IRI executives said.
Skin care marketers are going a layer deeper by developing
consumer-friendly products that mimic the effects of more
drastic methods, such as dermabrasion, botox and some forms
of plastic surgery. As skin products edge closer to dermatology,
the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is turning a more critical
eye on the skin care market. The category has a guardian angel,
however: the Cosmetic, Toiletry and Fragrance Association
(CTFA), which strives to keep options open for cosmetic formulators.
Last month, CTFA reported that it is preparing a legal memorandum
in response to a Federal Register notice requesting data
on six categories of ingredients considered eligible for
OTC review but not yet assessed. CTFA said it views the notice
as a possible attempt to move responsibility for these products
to the drug center as a new category called wrinkle removers.
Cosmetic industry experts argue that AHAs, BHAs and aloe
products simply reduce the appearance of wrinkles.
“What they’re looking at (is) that the mere presence
of these ingredients would make the products drugs, and that’s
like throwing down the gauntlet to this industry, because
we would certainly fight the FDA at every turn,” maintained
CTFA president Ed Kavanaugh. “Historically, you’re
either a cosmetic or a drug based on the intended use and
the claims you make for that product.”
While CTFA works to straighten out wrinkles in marketing
claims, formulators are busy developing products that deliver
what consumers want. This requires a complex balancing act
between pleasing the consumer and avoiding the FDA’s
ire. With all this activity, should be an interesting and
revealing year for skin care, according to industry experts
contacted by Happi.
At What Price Beauty?
“Which of us is older? Can you tell by our hands?”
asked the 1970s television commercial. Today, however, consumers
are more likely to reveal their age due to their spending
habits, marketers insist.
The Baby-Boomer and mature categories generally have the
greatest need for intensive skin care products, and these
consumers have more cash to spend than other age groups.
Anti-aging products are more popular than ever as women—and
men—shun cosmetic surgery in favor of gentler methods.
Topical products also tend to be less expensive than a visit
to the dermatologist’s office, though not always, industry
executives said.
Procter & Gamble, Cincinnati, OH, has a firm foothold
in the skin care industry with brands that are touted as both
effective and cost-conscious. Olay and Olay Complete held
top spots last year, at $45.7 million and $35.1 million in
sales respectively, according to IRI. This year, however,
P&G unveiled a surprise: SK-II (“Secret Key”),
acquired by the company in 1991 and a hit in Asia, was launched
in exclusive U.S. locations this March, for $50 -$250 an item.
The line, developed around a $130, 5-oz. jar of facial cream,
is aimed at the Baby Boomer demographic. It rolled out in
11 Saks Fifth Avenue stores across the U.S. in March.
SK-II has been available in Japan for 25 years. Part of its
mystique is built around an exotic backstory: a “secret
ingredient” was discovered by a Japanese monk who noticed
that sake (rice wine) brewers had especially soft hands, according
to company executives. The liquid from the sake fermentation
process was then turned into a cream, called pitera.
Executives at P&G in Japan said SK-II is more expensive
because pitera comes from a slow natural process that “combines
the power of nature with the advances of science” and
cannot be easily mass-produced.
In addition to the launch of SK-II, P&G is revving up
its tried-and-true (and more economically accessible) Olay
brand with Olay Moisturinse In Shower body lotion, in normal
to dry and extra dry versions. According to a P&G spokesperson,
Moisturinse tackles a common problem: while many people have
dry skin, some find a daily all-over body application of lotion
to be burdensome. Moisturinse arrives on mass retail shelves
in June. It retails for $4.99 for an 8.4-oz. container or
$6.99 for a 15.2-oz. container.
|